Legal Opinion

State v. Riddle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1997No. CRH950162; CA A90960PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, S. J.

In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, the state appeals a pretrial order suppressing the results of field sobriety tests (FSTs) and an Intoxilyzer test. The state contends that defendant’s right against self-compelled testimony under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution does not compel exclusion of the FSTs, nor does her right to consult with counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution compel exclusion of the breath test results. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

On February 24, 1995, Oregon State Police Trooper…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BeltOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. PenrodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. MatviyenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. StearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. GossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. RussumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API