Legal Opinion

Stockwell v. Lindeman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1964No. Civ. 28090PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiffs entered into an escrow agreement with defendant for the purchase and sale of certain real property. Defendant refused to consummate the sale and plaintiffs filed suit for damages. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained with leave to amend, and an amended complaint was filed which omitted the escrow instructions which were included as an exhibit in the original complaint, pleading their purported legal effect. A general demurrer was interposed to the amended complaint which was sustained without leave to amend and judgment for defendant was granted.

Plaintiffs appeal from such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Gould v. CallanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Hardy v. Admiral Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Handy v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Miller v. Citizens Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API