Legal Opinion
Glusman v. Trustees of the University of North Carolina
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 31, 1972No. 113PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
I
The regulations governing tuition status at the time petitioners were enrolled in the Law School established certain requirements for eligibility for in-state tuition. To be eligible, a prospective student (1) must have lived in this state, (2) with intent to make it a home, (3) for at least six months, and (4) without being enrolled in an institution of higher education during the six-month period. Thus, to qualify for in-state tuition, the regulations required that the student be domiciled in this state and in addition have been so domiciled without being enrolled in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Starns v. MalkersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Powe v. OdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Ledwell v. Berry Ex Rel. BrinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Hasse v. Board of Regents of University of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1973
- Hays v. Regents of University of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.