Appeal of Wal-Mart Stores
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The petitioner, Wal-Mart Stores (Wal-Mart), appeals the compensation appeals board’s (board) decision to grant the respondent, David Hargreaves, a twenty-eight percent permanent impairment award. We vacate and remand.
While employed by Wal-Mart, the respondent injured his left shoulder lifting and separating snow blowers. Wal-Mart’s insurance carrier, American International Group (AIG), accepted the respondent’s claim, but disputed the extent of his permanent impairment. The neurosurgeon who operated on the respondent determined that he suffered a twenty-eight percent permanent impairment. An…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Appeal of RainvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. HamelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Workplace Systems, Inc. v. CIGNA Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Gary S. v. Manchester School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003
- City of Huber Heights v. LiakosOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tuttle v. MED. MAL. JOINT UNDERWRITINGSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Martin v. PAT'S PEAK, INC.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.