Legal Opinion
State v. Hamel
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 31, 1994No. 93-200PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON J.
The defendant, Robert Hamel, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court {Lynn, J.) on a charge of felonious sexual assault. On appeal, the defendant argues that the Superior Court {Gray, J.) erred in denying his motion to dismiss because the statute of limitations had run. We affirm.
On September 1, 1992, the defendant was indicted on three counts of felonious sexual assault under RSA 632-A:3, II (1986). The indictments alleged that on October 20,1981, and between July 1 and September 1, 1982, the defendant engaged in sexual intercourse with a fifteen-year-old girl. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- State v. HodgsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. O'NEILLIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- The PEOPLE v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ParadiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.