Legal Opinion

Ex Parte General Nutrition Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 2003No. 1011760, 1011861, and 1011882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

855 So.2d 475 (2003)

Ex parte GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION and

Ex parte Phoenix Laboratories, Inc. and

Ex parte Cytodyne Technologies, Inc.

(In re Richard Gregory, as administrator of the estate of Shannon Gregory, deceased v. Cytodyne Technologies, Inc., et al.)

1011760, 1011861, and 1011882.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 7, 2003.

H.E. Nix, Jr., and S. Anthony Higgins of Nix, Holtsford, Gilliland, Higgins & Hitson, P.C., Montgomery, for petitioner General Nutrition Corporation.

Beverly P. Baker and James A. Patton, Jr., of Haskell, Slaughter, Young & Rediker, L.L.C., Birmingham; and Stephen R.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte American Resources Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ex Parte WigintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Malsch v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Vulcan Materials Co. v. AIGASupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Ex Parte DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Ex Parte Procom Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API