Legal Opinion

Vulcan Materials Co. v. AIGA

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 3, 2007No. 1060506PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Facts and Procedural History

At one time, Vulcan Materials Company manufactured and sold perchloroethylene (sometimes referred to as "perc"), a chemical used in the dry-cleaning process. In 1998, two municipal entities in California, the City of Modesto and the City of Modesto Redevelopment Agency, filed separate actions against Vulcan in state court in San Francisco, California, alleging that Vulcan was responsible for groundwater contamination and other property damage in over 50 locations around Modesto, California, caused by perchloroethylene. Those actions were consolidated and are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ben-Acadia, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Ex Parte Auto-Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte Preston Hood Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Alpha Claude Neon Corp. v. Pennsylvania Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Ex Parte FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. SafetyNet Youth Systems, LLC v. Guarantee Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Zurich Insurance Co. v. International Refining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Ala. Elec. Co. v. Dow Corning Ala., Inc. (Ex parte Dow Corning Ala., Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  5. Buller v. ClarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API