Ex Parte DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
The defendants below, DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("DaimlerChrysler") and Pierson Chevrolet, Inc. ("Pierson") (collectively "the petitioners"), petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge William H. Rhea III of the Etowah Circuit Court to dismiss the underlying action so that it may be refiled in the appropriate court in Utah…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte Perfection Siding, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grider v. City of Auburn, Ala.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- E.W.H. v. A.M.P.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Grider v. City of AuburnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
- Ex Parte BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Seaborn v. Michelin North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.