Legal Opinion
Gillon v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MD.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 29, 2004No. CIV.A. RDB-03-2989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BENNETT, District Judge.
Pending are: (1) the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) the Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Plaintiffs Opposition as untimely; and (3) the Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Plaintiffs Sur-reply. No oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2001). For the reasons that follow, the Court will DENY the Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Plaintiffs Opposition, GRANT the Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Plaintiffs Surreply, and GRANT the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gipson v. Vertex Aerospace, LLC (V2X)District Court, D. Maryland · 2025