Legal Opinion

Gray v. Magee

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1930No. Docket No. 445PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, J.

Victoria P. de Magee died intestate in 1886 and left as part of her estate certain lands in San Diego County which lie on the southwesterly slope of the Agua Tibia Mountain, in an elevated valley or bench bordered on all sides, except the southwest, by rapidly rising ground. Hugh Magee, as one of the executors of this estate, has been in personal charge of these lands since about 1913. He has also entered under the law of the United States as cattle-raising homesteads, certain other adjoining tracts of land on the east, the north and the southwest. Portions of these other lands have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Buehler v. BassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. City of Eureka v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Gray v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Kennedy v. BedenbaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Millview County Water Dist. v. State Water Res.California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API