Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Bedenbaugh

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 2002No. 25553PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We granted this petition for a writ of certiorari to determine whether the unity of title needed to establish an easement by necessity can exist where a person owns one tract of land in fee simple and an adjoining tract of land with another person as tenants in common. We find unity of title is not so established and affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

Petitioners and respondent are adjoining landowners of property. Respondent’s tract and petitioners’ tract (hereinafter referred to as the land-locked tract) were originally joined as one piece of property owned by Jacob Lindler.

In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  2. Garvin v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Bradley v. BradleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nichols v. City of EvansdaleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Proctor v. SteedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Paine Gayle Properties, LLC v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API