Legal Opinion

City of Eureka v. Fay

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1895No. 15719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The plaintiff, a muncipal corporation, brought this action to recover possession of a strip *168of land alleged to be a portion of Sixth street in said city. The cause was tried by a jury, whose verdict was in favor of plaintiff, and judgment was rendered thereon. The defendants have appealed from the judgment.

The plaintiff claims title to the demanded premises by dedication, partly from Charles Raymond and partly from Richard Duff; while defendants claim the whole premises by conveyance from Charles Raymond; and the principal and controlling questions relate to the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cerf v. PflegingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Phillips v. DayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  3. Hicks v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Gray v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Johnson v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API