Asplund v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton; Cooper* J., presiding. Case by Victor Asplund against the Calumet & Hecla Mining Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff is a miner, and while at work in the Osceola lode of the defendant’s mine he was injured by the falling of a considerable mass of rock. His thigh was broken, and he received other injuries. After plaintiff had put in all his evidence, defendant putting in no evidence, a directed verdict was requested on *the part of the defendant. This request was denied. The case was submitted to a jury, which returned a substantial verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The case is brought here by writ of error.
*531The errors assigned make it necessary to quote freely from the charge of the court,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Toomey v. Eureka Iron & Steer WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Roux v. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Bailey v. CostelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Lyttle v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barkow v. Donovan Wire & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Baucino v. FitzpatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Stone v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1916