Legal Opinion

Gorrey v. W. F. Hurd Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913No. Docket No. 65PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Case by Michael Gorrey against the W. F. Hurd Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff was a woodworker employed for four or five years by defendant on a sticker machine. He claims to have received an injury to the eye, not from his machine, but one adjoining it and about four feet away. This suit was commenced by declaration. Omitting its formal parts, the material averments are:

“Whereupon it became and was the duty of said defendant corporation to furnish the said plaintiff with reasonably sound, safe, and suitable machinery, appliances, fixtures, and place for the making and manufacture by said plaintiff of said woodenware as aforesaid, while so employed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schlacker v. Ashland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mann v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fey v. Nashville Gas & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API