Legal Opinion
Agovino & Asselta, LLP v. Rubens
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 25, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Pursuant to Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 137, Richard Rubens sought an arbitration of his fee dispute with the law firm of Agovino & Asselta, LLP (Agovino & Asselta). Following a hearing, the panel of arbitrators rendered an award in favor of Agovino & Asselta in the principal sum of $14,097 (see Rules of Chief Administrator of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 137.7 [f]). Within 30 days after the mailing of the arbitration award, Rubens attempted to obtain de novo review of the parties’ fee…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of InvestmentsNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Presidential Realty Corp. v. Michael Square West, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. Bombay Spirits Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Louden v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Law Offs. of Thomas F. Liotti, LLC v. DavoudiaslAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017