Legal Opinion
Presidential Realty Corp. v. Michael Square West, Ltd.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 1978PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Although the nature and purpose of a solitary business meeting conducted for a single day in New York may supply the minimum contacts necessary to subject a nonresident participant to the jurisdiction of our courts (see, e.g., Riener Co. v Schwartz, 41 NY2d 648; cf. Parke-Bernet Galleries v Franklyn, 26 NY2d 13), physical presence alone cannot talismanically transform any and all business dealings into business transactions under CPLR 302 (subd [a], par [1]) (e.g., McKee Elec. Co. v Rauland-Borg…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- George Reiner & Co. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Glassman v. HyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Hi Fashion Wigs, Inc. v. Peter Hammond Advertising, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
3Cited by43 opinions
- McGowan v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bolton v. GramlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Dogan v. Harbert Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.