Legal Opinion
Standard Wine & Liquor Co. v. Bombay Spirits Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 25, 1967PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
Once again we are called upon to construe our ‘ ‘ long-arm statute ’ ’ to determine whether a particular foreign corporation is amenable to suit in our courts.
The plaintiff-appellant is a New York corporation, duly licensed as a “ distributor of liquors ” here, with a sales force of several dozen salesmen. The defendant-respondent, Bombay Spirits Co., a Scottish corporation not licensed to do business in New York, manufactures Bombay brand gin and vermouth. The other defendants — who are not parties to this appeal — are A. M. Penrose & Co., a Pennsylvania corporation licensed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Liquid Carriers Corporation v. American Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
3Cited by35 opinions
- John J. Galgay, as Trustee in the Reorganization of R. Hoe & Co., Inc. v. Bulletin Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Intermeat, Inc. v. American Poultry Incorporated and a & W FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Volk Corp. v. Art-Pak Clip Art ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Friedr. Zoellner (New York) Corporation v. Tex Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- George Pieczenik and I C Technologies America, Inc. v. Dyax CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.