Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hairston

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 12, 1958No. 10,837PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

A special court-martial convicted the accused of making a false official statement in connection with an investigation into the theft of a radio and of larceny of the radio, in violation, respectively, of Articles 107 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 907 and 921. The conviction was affirmed by intermediate appellate authorities and we granted review to consider two matters.

The circumstances under which the purportedly “official” statement was made are substantially like those in United States v Washington, 9 USCMA 131, 25…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. SoccioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. AronsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. BallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. HurtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. CumminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. PapenheimUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. RobersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API