Legal Opinion
Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 20, 2000No. 99 Civ. 12054(AGS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, former employees of defendant Wilco Systems (“Wilco”), commenced this action seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief arising out of the alleged exploitation of domestic and foreign workers in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York state law. Currently before the Court are separate motions to dismiss by Wilco and by defendants Janet Reno and Alexis Herman (the “government defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, Wilco’s motion to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wolff v. Rare Medium, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Goel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Panwar v. Access Therapies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2013
- Seever v. Carrols Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.