in the Interest of J.K v. a Child
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice Morriss
This opinion on rehearing is issued as a substitute for our original opinion issued March 15, 2016.
Laurelio Vero’s parental rights to his three-year-old son, Justin, were terminated in a suit, and Vero appeals, arguing only that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to establish that terminating Vero’s parental rights to Jústin was in Justin’s best interest. 1 See Tex. Fam. Cobe Ann. § 161.001(b)(2) (West Supp.2015). Because we conclude that the best-interest finding was not supported by factually 2 sufficient evidence, we reverse the trial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re B.D.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- In the Interest of S.C.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017