Legal Opinion

in the Interest of J.K v. a Child

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided April 20, 2016No. 06-15-00098-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice Morriss

This opinion on rehearing is issued as a substitute for our original opinion issued March 15, 2016.

Laurelio Vero’s parental rights to his three-year-old son, Justin, were terminated in a suit, and Vero appeals, arguing only that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to establish that terminating Vero’s parental rights to Jústin was in Justin’s best interest. 1 See Tex. Fam. Cobe Ann. § 161.001(b)(2) (West Supp.2015). Because we conclude that the best-interest finding was not supported by factually 2 sufficient evidence, we reverse the trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re B.D.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. In the Interest of S.C.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API