Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. City of New Philadelphia

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2011No. 2010-0963PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGee Brown, J.

Introduction

{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is the meaning of the term “aggrieved” as it is used in R.C. 149.351. 1 The question presented is whether a party automatically becomes aggrieved as a matter of law when his request for a public record is denied due to an improper disposition of the record. We hold that a party is not aggrieved by the destruction of a record when the party’s objective in requesting the record is not to obtain the record but to seek a forfeiture for the wrongful destruction of the record. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Fifth District Court of Appeals.

Facts…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Boley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State Ex Rel. DiFranco v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Great Lakes Bar Control, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API