Rhodes v. City of New Philadelphia
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcGee Brown, J.
Introduction
{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is the meaning of the term “aggrieved” as it is used in R.C. 149.351. 1 The question presented is whether a party automatically becomes aggrieved as a matter of law when his request for a public record is denied due to an improper disposition of the record. We hold that a party is not aggrieved by the destruction of a record when the party’s objective in requesting the record is not to obtain the record but to seek a forfeiture for the wrongful destruction of the record. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Fifth District Court of Appeals.
Facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gilbert v. Summit CountyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Morgan v. City of New LexingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Boley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State Ex Rel. DiFranco v. City of South EuclidOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Great Lakes Bar Control, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.