Legal Opinion
Student Loan Marketing Ass'n v. Riley
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 10, 1997No. Nos. 95-5428, 96-5016PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
Concurring Opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
In the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Congress added § 439(h)(7) to the Higher Education Act of 1965, imposing a 0.3 percent “offset fee” on the principal amount of each student loan that the Student Loan Marketing Association (“Sallie Mae”) “holds.” The Department of Education interpreted the statute as applying to any loan in which Sallie Mae has a financial interest, and, in particular, to loans that Sallie Mae has “secu-ritized.” (A firm…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- College Loan Corp. v. SLM Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Bruin Portfolio, LLC v. Leicht (In Re Leicht)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1998
- Asociación De Subscripción Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Flores GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.