Legal Opinion

United States v. P. John Hanrahan, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 18, 1958No. 4934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Chief Judge

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division (C. D. 1900) sustaining a protest by the importer and holding the merchandise involved, invoiced as “wheat gum gluten,” to be dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739, as a manufactured article not specially provided for. The collector classified the merchandise under the sanie paragraph, but held it to be dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem on the ground that it was an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Cruikshank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  4. In re CruikshankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  5. Boak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BASF Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. BASF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. North American Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  4. Franklin v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API