Cruikshank v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the importer from a decision of the United States circuit court for the southern district of New York, affirming a decision of the board of United States general appraisers to the effect that certain merchandise imported by the appellant into the port of New York was subject to duty. 54 Fed. 676. The appellant imported certain “chillies” or “bird peppers,” whole, but in a dried state, a product of Sierra *447Leone, and they were classified and subjected to duty by the collector under paragraph 326 of the tariff act of 1890. That paragraph reads as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re CruikshankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. P. John Hanrahan, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- P. John Hanrahan, Inc., Trans. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Schall & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.