Legal Opinion
Franklin v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 28, 2001No. Slip Op. 01-32; 99-05-00283PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Plaintiff, Arthur L. Franklin d/b/a/ Health Technologies Network (“Arthur Franklin”), challenges a decision of the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) denying Arthur Franklin’s protests filed in accordance with section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (1994). At issue is the proper tariff classification under 19 U.S.C. § 1202, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), of Arthur Franklin’s imports of coral sand packets marketed under the names “Ericssons Alka-Mine Coral Calcium” and “Alka-Line Coral Calcium,” and identified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arthur L. Franklin (Doing Business as Health Technologies Network) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- DMV USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- C.J. Tower, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003