Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
Plaintiff worked at defendant’s steel manufacturing plant. He has chronic infectious paranasal sinusitis, a preexisting condition that predisposes him to experience airway irritation. During his employment with defendant, plaintiff suffered transient irritation of the upper respiratory tract and a bout of paranasal sinusitis as a result of inhalation of substances found in his workplace. Plaintiff is a subject worker and defendant is in compliance with the Workers’ Compensation Law, ORS chapter 656. Plaintiff sought medical treatment and filed a workers’ compensation claim. Pursuant to ORS…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carr v. U S West Direct Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Reynolds v. HarbertOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Sumner v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Metcalf v. CaseOregon Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- SAIF Corp. v. YokumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Bundy v. NuStar GP LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- Jackson v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.