Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Fred Meyer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1996No. 94CV0266; CA A85672PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her personal injury claim against defendant, her former employer. ORCP 47. The trial court held that plaintiff’s exclusive remedy was under the Workers’ Compensation Act. Plaintiff argues that the Act violates Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, because it takes away her common law remedy against defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim for a work-related injury that occurred in September 1990. She claimed that the injury “aggravated a pre-existing condition in her right wrist.” Defendant accepted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gortmaker v. SeatonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Portland v. One Parcel of Real PropertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API