Legal Opinion

Black v. Delano

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 30, 1948No. 10615PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

Our appellate jurisdiction has been repeatedly invoked in litigation involving, in varying phases, the right of the State of Michigan to apply its statutes of escheat to deposits in the First National Bank-Detroit, a national bank in liquidation.

In Starr, Attorney General v. O’Connor, Comptroller of the Currency, 6 Cir., 118 F.2d 548 [decided March 14, 1941]; we reviewed at length the state’s escheat laws, construed relevant provisions thereof, and attempted to demonstrate from highest authority that, while national banks are subject to state laws which do not interfere…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. First National Bank of San Jose v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Rushton v. SchramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roth v. DelanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Roth, Atty. Gen. v. Delano, ComptrollerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API