Rochester American Ins. Co. v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal by defendant below from a judgment rendered against it and in favor of Lena J. Thomas in the sum of $600, representing the amount due on a policy of fire insurance. The defense interposed was that Lena J. Thomas did not have, as required by a clause and condition of the policy of insurance, an “unconditional and sole ownership” of the property insured and destroyed by fire. Lizzie Dickson intervened and became a party defendant below.
The property insured was a residence located in Avant, Osage county, Okla. H. O. I iiekson had owned the property for 20 years. Dickson and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Garver v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. L. C. Adam Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North American Accident Ins. Co. v. Canady, Adm'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Higgins v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935