Legal Opinion

Rochester American Ins. Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1935No. 24976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal by defendant below from a judgment rendered against it and in favor of Lena J. Thomas in the sum of $600, representing the amount due on a policy of fire insurance. The defense interposed was that Lena J. Thomas did not have, as required by a clause and condition of the policy of insurance, an “unconditional and sole ownership” of the property insured and destroyed by fire. Lizzie Dickson intervened and became a party defendant below.

The property insured was a residence located in Avant, Osage county, Okla. H. O. I iiekson had owned the property for 20 years. Dickson and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Garver v. Hawkeye Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. L. C. Adam Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North American Accident Ins. Co. v. Canady, Adm'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Higgins v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API