Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Phoenix Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1935No. , 25617PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial court the plaintiffs, Harold Higgins et al., sued the defendant, Phoenix Insurance Company, a corporation, to recover on fire insurance policy for the loss by fire of an automobile.

At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiffs’ evidence, and discharged the jury and rendered judgment for the defendant.

The plaintiffs on appeal urge error of the trial court in sustaining such demurrer to their evidence.

The controlling question concerns a certain mortgage lien upon the automobile and certain provisions of the insurance policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Rochester American Ins. Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Northern Assur. Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Schonwald v. Sun Insurance Office, LimitedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Blaylock v. MalerneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API