Legal Opinion

Mahncke v. Mahncke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1906No. 6218PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered October 5, 1905, upon motion of the defendant, after a hearing on the merits, directing the discontinuance of alimony awarded by a decree of divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

The appellant, Alice E. Mahncke, and respondent, Henry Mahncke, were married on Eebruary 5, 1902, and separated about eighteen months later. On January 18, 1905, a decree of divorce was granted to respondent on his cross-complaint in this action. Said decree granted to each party the property then standing in his or her name, and to appellant most of the personal property then in her possession. The appellant was, by said decree, awarded $70 as alimony, and also additional alimony in the sum of $25 per month, payable monthly from the date of said decree, the same “to continue until otherwise…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brandt v. BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. In re CaveWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loomis v. LoomisWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cotter v. CotterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. Worden v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Loomis v. LoomisWashington Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API