Jones v. Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
..Appeal from. Fayette Chancery Court. Heard before the Hon. John C. Carmichael. A sufficient statement of facts .appears in the opinion. cited, Code, 1898 § 857; Allen v. Allen, 80 Ala. 106; Freeman on Executions, §§ 23, 32; Stafford v. Bank, 17 How. 275; Posey v. Pressley, 60 Ala. 248. Freeman on Executions, § 32; Rutland’s Adm. v. Pippin, 7 Ala. 469; 5 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, 371; Jones v. Wilson, 54 Ala. 50; 5 Am. & Eng. Ency.
Read the full summary
..Appeal from. Fayette Chancery Court. Heard before the Hon. John C. Carmichael. A sufficient statement of facts .appears in the opinion. cited, Code, 1898 § 857; Allen v. Allen, 80 Ala. 106; Freeman on Executions, §§ 23, 32; Stafford v. Bank, 17 How. 275; Posey v. Pressley, 60 Ala. 248. Freeman on Executions, § 32; Rutland’s Adm. v. Pippin, 7 Ala. 469; 5 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, 371; Jones v. Wilson, 54 Ala. 50; 5 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, 374; 24 Mich. 176; E(hoards v. Edwards, 71 Ala. 83.
1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.
The appellant filed her petition in the chancery court, praying that under a former decree of said court, in the case of Josephine E. Jones v. William W. Jones, an order be made awarding her an execution under said decree, for the collection of alimony which bad accrued to her, and further praying for a reference to the register to ascertain the amount of alimony then due her by the defendant in tlie petition under said former decree of the court.. This petition was answered by the defendant, William W. Jones, and proof was taken and the cause submitted on petition, *445answer and proof, and a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hager v. HagerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Smith v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Ortman v. OrtmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Brinn v. BrinnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.