Loomis v. Loomis
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
47 Wn.2d 468 (1955)
288 P.2d 235
ARTHUR R. LOOMIS, Appellant,
v.
DOLLY A. LOOMIS, Respondent.[1]
No. 33113.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
September 22, 1955.
Hall, Cole & Lawrence and Stanley F. Atwood, for appellant.
Oliver J. Neibel, Jr., and Luvern V. Rieke, amici curiae.
WEAVER, J.
Do the courts of this state have the power, under existing statutes (Laws of 1949, chapter 215, § 11, p. 701; RCW 26.08.110), to grant alimony for the support of a spouse in a case of absolute divorce when there are no minor or dependent children? This is a question of first impression in this court. See…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- In re CaveWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Loomis v. LoomisWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Warning v. WarningWashington Supreme Court · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.