Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Loomis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1955No. 33113Published

1Opinion of the Court

47 Wn.2d 468 (1955)

288 P.2d 235

ARTHUR R. LOOMIS, Appellant,

v.

DOLLY A. LOOMIS, Respondent.[1]

No. 33113.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 22, 1955.

Hall, Cole & Lawrence and Stanley F. Atwood, for appellant.

Oliver J. Neibel, Jr., and Luvern V. Rieke, amici curiae.

WEAVER, J.

Do the courts of this state have the power, under existing statutes (Laws of 1949, chapter 215, § 11, p. 701; RCW 26.08.110), to grant alimony for the support of a spouse in a case of absolute divorce when there are no minor or dependent children? This is a question of first impression in this court. See…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In re CaveWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Loomis v. LoomisWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Warning v. WarningWashington Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API