Legal Opinion

Noble v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 2012No. 700142; A140936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Petitioners, who own property on a small stream near Oregon City, seek review of a final order of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) approving fish-ways1 on two downstream dams owned by Lytle and Stoyan, respectively. Petitioners assign as error ODFW’s conclusion that fish require passage at the Lytle and Stoyan dams only when water flows over the spillways of the dams. We conclude that ODFW correctly construed the fish passage requirements in OAR 635-412-0035 to require fish passage over those dams only when there is water in their channel-spanning fishways. Consequently, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noble v. Department of Fish & WildlifeOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Noble v. Oregon Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API