Noble v. Oregon Water Resources Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Petitioners appeal following the circuit court’s judicial review of an order by the Oregon Water Resources Department (the department) in other than a contested case. The order permitted petitioners’ neighboring landowner, Lytle, to maintain a reservoir in a stream that runs on his property as well as petitioners’ properties, with certain conditions. The circuit court set aside and remanded the order on the basis that Lytle’s permit application was substantively deficient and that the department had misapplied the relevant statute, ORS 537.409, when it concluded otherwise. Petitioners now ask…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- England v. Thunderbird & Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Castro v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Archbold v. Div. of Child SupportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
- NW Environ. Advocates v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026