Legal Opinion

Cocores v. Assimopoulos

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1932No. Docket No. 8122PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellants’ motion to quash and set aside a writ of attachment theretofore issued in the action.

It will be unnecessary to specifically detail the facts to the extent of setting forth the character of the property involved or the amount or terms of payment. The concrete question may be presented by a more or less general statement. Plaintiff was the owner of certain personal property, consisting of fixtures and furnishings for a candy store. Defendants entered into a contract with plaintiff whereby plaintiff agreed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin Music Co. v. RobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Frankel v. RosenfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ghirardelli v. Peninsula Properties Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Smith v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. James v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Beck v. Shepherd Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Blodgett v. Merritt Annex Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API