Legal Opinion

Frankel v. Rosenfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1928No. Docket No. 6278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Plaintiff, Julius Frankel, brought this action to recover a money judgment against defendant, as the alleged guarantor of a conditional sales contract, and to obtain an order directing a bank to deliver to the sheriff certain corporate stock belonging to defendant and claimed by plaintiff to have been deposited with said bank as collateral security, so that the same could be sold in liquidation of the judgment which plaintiff sought to obtain. Judgment was given in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Assuming that the agreements of the parties hereinafter set forth legally established a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Merrill v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Smith v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. James v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Beck v. Shepherd Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Cocores v. AssimopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API