Harrington v. National Outdoor Advertising Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
Action for $300,000 actual and $900,000 punitive damages for alleged conspiracy of defendants and others to wrongfully procure[788] the disclosure of and to wrongfully appropriate plaintiff's trade secret or invention. The jury returned a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff has appealed from the ensuing judgment.
It was alleged by plaintiff that defendants, conspiring, induced the disclosure of plaintiff's invention by means of a contract executed March 18, 1936, whereby defendant National Outdoor Advertising Company (in bad faith) undertook to sell a large number of the units of plaintiff's…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Lewis Ex Rel. Piening v. ZagataSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Mendenhall v. NeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Allen-Qualley Co. v. Shellmar Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929
- American Dirigold Corp. v. Dirigold Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Tatum v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- United States v. Walter LiewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Merritt v. MantonySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Mobile Medical International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.