Legal Opinion

Harrington v. National Outdoor Advertising Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 9, 1946No. 39405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action for $300,000 actual and $900,000 punitive damages for alleged conspiracy of defendants and others to wrongfully procure[788] the disclosure of and to wrongfully appropriate plaintiff's trade secret or invention. The jury returned a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff has appealed from the ensuing judgment.

It was alleged by plaintiff that defendants, conspiring, induced the disclosure of plaintiff's invention by means of a contract executed March 18, 1936, whereby defendant National Outdoor Advertising Company (in bad faith) undertook to sell a large number of the units of plaintiff's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Lewis Ex Rel. Piening v. ZagataSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Mendenhall v. NeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Allen-Qualley Co. v. Shellmar Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929
  5. American Dirigold Corp. v. Dirigold Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tatum v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. United States v. Walter LiewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Merritt v. MantonySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Mobile Medical International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API