Legal Opinion

Mendenhall v. Neyer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 3, 1941PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C.A. Neyer and J.J. Griesemer, copartners, doing business as Neyer Construction Company, and Virgil Lawrence, defendants below, appeal from an order sustaining Birttie Mendenhall's, plaintiff below, motion for new trial. The court granted the new trial on the ground error had been committed in giving instructions Nos. 8, 10 and 12 on behalf of said appellants. Respondent seeks $10,000 for the alleged wrongful death of Amos Mendenhall, her husband.

Mr. and Mrs. Mendenhall and five children, including Oscar, a minor of eighteen, and Irva, an adult, lived on a farm near Cedar Grove, Missouri.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Borgstede v. WaldbauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Doherty Ex Rel. Doherty v. St. Louis Butter Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Feary v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Griffith v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Peppers v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Lewis Ex Rel. Piening v. ZagataSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. West v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Knox v. WeathersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Le Grand v. U-Drive-It Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Stanich v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API