Legal Opinion
Central National Bank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 11, 1949No. 48217PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge
This proceeding involves a motion by defendant under Section 14 (b) of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, asking this court to issue a summons in this action directed to T. *391H. Kent, 3012 Kensington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia, requiring him to appear in the action and answer a contingent claim of the United States.
It appears that on October 8, 1945, the Government entered into a written contract with T. H. Kent, an individual trading as Kent and Company, whereby the latter for the sum of $22,600 agreed to furnish materials and perform the work of repairing and renewing certain roads for the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Central Nat. Bank of Richmond, Va. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Malman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Great American Insurance Company v. The United States, and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Great American Insurance Company v. The United States, and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.