Legal Opinion

Norris v. Stoneham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 8, 1932No. 937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.

Recovery was had below on two severable causes of action. We shall first make a statement of the case applicable to one of these, and, after considering it, shall make an additional statement applicable to the other. Appellee, Mrs. H. W. Stoneham, is a married woman. She instituted this action in her own name, without being joined by her husband, against appellant, Mrs. Pearl Norris, an unmarried woman, fcu^, damages alleged to have been sustained by her on account of the alienation of her husband’s affections. Her petition charged, in substance, that, beginning in the month of July, 1928,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Nickerson v. NickersonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bigaouette v. PauletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Egbert v. GreenwaltMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Franco v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Timon v. DolanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Ellzey v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Lisle v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API