Legal Opinion

Wright v. AAA Construction Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*532The Supreme Court erred in concluding that the defendants satisfied their respective prima facie burdens on their separate motions for summary judgment by showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In support of their motions, the defendants relied on essentially the same submissions. Included within those submissions was the affirmed medical report of their examining orthopedic surgeon, who…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Zamaniyan v. VrabeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Scotti v. BoutureiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Quiceno v. MendozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Mondevil v. KumarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Grisales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Torres v. TorranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API