Legal Opinion

Quiceno v. Mendoza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 6, 2010PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (Ambrosio, J.), dated May 4, 2009, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is. affirmed, with costs.

While we affirm the order appealed from, we do so on grounds different from those relied upon by the Supreme Court. The defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Busljeta v. Plandome Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Torres v. GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Bengaly v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Katanov v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Smith v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Mondevil v. KumarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Fields v. HildagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Grisales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API