Legal Opinion

Mondevil v. Kumar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Surinder Kumar and Paramjit Multani appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated March 3, 2010, which denied their motion for summary-judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not err in concluding that the appellants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Coscia v. 938 Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Smith v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Quiceno v. MendozaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Katanov v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Edouazin v. ChamplainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Grisales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Rocourt v. AlveloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Cheour v. Pete & Sals Harborview Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API