Legal Opinion

City of Sandusky v. Roberts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1924No. Docket No. 152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Certain paving was done by plaintiff city in front of defendant’s premises on Sanilac avenue, in the city of Sandusky. A special assessment district was created by the council, and defendant’s premises included therein. Defendant refused to pay his assessment, and this suit was begun in assumpsit to recover the amount due under the authority of 1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 3134,

Defendant urged several defenses affecting the validity of the assessment. The defenses were, however, overruled by the court and judgment rendered for the city.

1. Exception was taken to the validity of the assessment because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Palmer v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gray v. DingmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Long v. City of MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API