Palmer v. City of Port Huron
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Clair; Tappan, J. Bill by Thomas W. Palmer against the city of Port Huron and others to set aside a paving assessment. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainant owns certain vacant land, which has been subdivided into lots, in the city of Port Huron. On the west this land abuts a highway known as “Gratiot Avenue.” The city has paved said Gratiot avenue, and has assessed against complainant’s property a portion of the expenses of said pavement. This suit is instituted for the purpose of' setting aside said assessment. The case was heard in the court below on pleadings and proofs, and a decree granted to complainant on the ground that legal notice was not given of said assessment. The material question raised by this appeal relates to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kansas City v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Auditor General v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Boehme v. City of MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Kalamazoo v. FrancoiseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Williams v. ViselichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Realty Trust Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- City of Sandusky v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Auditor General v. WellmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Davis v. Board of Commr. of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913