Legal Opinion · Dissent

Long v. City of Monroe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1933No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 35,514Published

1DissentWeadock, J.

Suit was brought in the circuit court in chancery to set aside special assessments levied by the city of Monroe for the widening of Monroe street.

Several petitions were circulated and filed praying for the widening and straightening of Monroe street between Front street and Elm avenue and the construction of a bridge across the Raisin river. The entire cost of the construction of the bridge and one-half the cost of widening the' street was to be borne by the city of Monroe, the other half of the cost to be defrayed by a special assessment district.

The charter of the city of Monroe provides…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Ceeder v. H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ahern v. Board of Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1901

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API