Legal Opinion

Gray v. Dingman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 38,799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

This case, here .on 147 pag’es of pleadings and a brief stipulation of facts, involves the validity of proceeding’s in Wayne county taken under the drain law.

July 31, 1926, an application was filed with the county drain commissioner of Wayne county for laying out a drainage district under Act No. 316, Pub. Acts 1923, as amended by Act No. 365, Pub. Acts 1925. Proceedings regular in form were taken upon this application for the laying out of a drainage district and the construction of a drain therein under the acts above mentioned, and for the apportionment of benefits therefor. Contracts were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Charlotte Harbor & Northern Railway Co. v. WellesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Township of Lake v. MillarMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Clinton v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metro Homes, Inc. v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Newberry v. Nine Mile-Halfway Drain DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API