Legal Opinion

State v. Martinson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1990No. C5-90-920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Jack Arthur Martinson appeals from a $20,000 fine and a $2,000 surcharge, part of his sentence upon his plea of guilty to third degree sale of a controlled substance, cocaine. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a fine and surcharge inconsistent with the state’s offer to agree to a misdemeanor sentence. He also argues the fine is excessive because of his indigency. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Martinson sold cocaine to an undercover agent of the Willmar Police Department who visited Martinson at his home looking for the drug. Martinson bought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevin Allen WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. GamelgardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. State v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. RamstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. NiemczykCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Perkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API