Legal Opinion

State v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1996No. C6-95-2582PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Appellant Matthew Allan Lambert challenges the district court’s imposition of a $25,000 fine for his conviction of second-degree controlled substance crime. We affirm.

FACTS

In October 1994, in exchange for $600, Lambert delivered an envelope containing cocaine to a man acting as a police informant. Lambert was charged with one count of second-degree controlled substance crime and he pleaded guilty. Pursuant to the plea agreement, the prosecution recommended a downward sentencing departure. The district court imposed the 51-month recommended downward departure because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koppinger v. City of FairmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. MartinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API